Fred Thompson is an A-Hole

I consider myself an open-minded individual willing to listen to all of the candidates for President. Currently, my favorite candidate has been Ron Paul. He speaks my language, and says the things I have been thinking about the Federal Reserve and other organizations. However, even though I have been a supporter, I still like to hear what others are saying.

After talking with my friend, I decided that Fred Thompson has the "equation" neccesary to win. He's white - and let's be real - America is NOT ready for a black president. I like Barack Obama, but I have trouble believing he could beat a cowboy-hat-wearing-Republican that is recognizable because of his role on TV. All the older generation will vote for him and proclaim him to be the next 'Ronald Reagan'. And as progress has been made in my state and the North, people in the south still have some ignorant assholes that are racist.

So, Fred Thompson will be the loveable teddy bear huh?
then I encourage you to watch this:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=DdAm6UY4xOE

This video is a response to Michael Moore's allegations that members of Congress are smoking illegal cigars from Cuba, but, they want to indict Michael Moore for his trip to Cuba in the film Sicko.

Now before you say, Michael Moore is a jackass - make sure you have seen Sicko. The film is his most unbiased view on a political level, and I found it to simply place the fact on the HMO suck concepts.

This video from Fred Thompson infuriated me - He's making a statement back in a here's my cigar (middle finger), hope they lock you up.

That's someone being an asshole. I don't want my president to be a cocky son-of-a-bitch, and that's all Fred Thomspon showed me.

Therefore, if Ron Paul is not in the running, and Fred Thompson gets the nod, I promise, PROMISE - I will be voting democrat regardless of whose running, and I will use all my energy to promote the other candidate.

Who do you think your fucking kidding Fred? Get back to Hollywood.

So long 5th Amendment Rights.... so long....

This is why we need Ron Paul.

Read the verbiage in these sections, it's scary how vague some are....


Executive Order: Blocking Property of Certain Persons Who Threaten Stabilization Efforts in Iraq

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, as amended (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.)(IEEPA), the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.)(NEA), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code,

I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, find that, due to the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States posed by acts of violence threatening the peace and stability of Iraq and undermining efforts to promote economic reconstruction and political reform in Iraq and to provide humanitarian assistance to the Iraqi people, it is in the interests of the United States to take additional steps with respect to the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13303 of May 22, 2003, and expanded in Executive Order 13315 of August 28, 2003, and relied upon for additional steps taken in Executive Order 13350 of July 29, 2004, and Executive Order 13364 of November 29, 2004. I hereby order:

Section 1. (a) Except to the extent provided in section 203(b)(1), (3), and (4) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1702(b)(1), (3), and (4)), or in regulations, orders, directives, or licenses that may be issued pursuant to this order, and notwithstanding any contract entered into or any license or permit granted prior to the date of this order, all property and interests in property of the following persons, that are in the United States, that hereafter come within the United States, or that are or hereafter come within the possession or control of United States persons, are blocked and may not be transferred, paid, exported, withdrawn, or otherwise dealt in: any person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense,

(i) to have committed, or to pose a significant risk of committing, an act or acts of violence that have the purpose or effect of:

(A) threatening the peace or stability of Iraq or the Government of Iraq; or

(B) undermining efforts to promote economic reconstruction and political reform in Iraq or to provide humanitarian assistance to the Iraqi people;

(ii) to have materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, logistical, or technical support for, or goods or services in support of, such an act or acts of violence or any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; or

(iii) to be owned or controlled by, or to have acted or purported to act for or on behalf of, directly or indirectly, any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order.(b) The prohibitions in subsection (a) of this section include, but are not limited to, (i) the making of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order, and (ii) the receipt of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services from any such person.

Sec. 2. (a) Any transaction by a United States person or within the United States that evades or avoids, has the purpose of evading or avoiding, or attempts to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.

(b) Any conspiracy formed to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.

Sec. 3. For purposes of this order:

(a) the term "person" means an individual or entity;

(b) the term "entity" means a partnership, association, trust, joint venture, corporation, group, subgroup, or other organization; and

(c) the term "United States person" means any United States citizen, permanent resident alien, entity organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches), or any person in the United States.

Sec. 4. I hereby determine that the making of donations of the type specified in section 203(b)(2) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1702(b)(2)) by, to, or for the benefit of, any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order would seriously impair my ability to deal with the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13303 and expanded in Executive Order 13315, and I hereby prohibit such donations as provided by section 1 of this order.

Sec. 5. For those persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States, I find that, because of the ability to transfer funds or other assets instantaneously, prior notice to such persons of measures to be taken pursuant to this order would render these measures ineffectual. I therefore determine that for these measures to be effective in addressing the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13303 and expanded in Executive Order 13315, there need be no prior notice of a listing or determination made pursuant to section 1(a) of this order.

Sec. 6. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense, is hereby authorized to take such actions, including the promulgation of rules and regulations, and to employ all powers granted to the President by IEEPA as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this order. The Secretary of the Treasury may redelegate any of these functions to other officers and agencies of the United States Government, consistent with applicable law. All agencies of the United States Government are hereby directed to take all appropriate measures within their authority to carry out the provisions of this order and, where appropriate, to advise the Secretary of the Treasury in a timely manner of the measures taken.

Sec. 7. Nothing in this order is intended to affect the continued effectiveness of any rules, regulations, orders, licenses, or other forms of administrative action issued, taken, or continued in effect heretofore or hereafter under 31 C.F.R. chapter V, except as expressly terminated, modified, or suspended by or pursuant to this order.

Sec. 8. This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right, benefit, or privilege, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, instrumentalities, or entities, its officers or employees, or any other person.

GEORGE W. BUSH

THE WHITE HOUSE,

July 17, 2007.

So how long till Ron Paul gets arrested for trying to end the war?

Comments?

-Slice and Dice

The Driving Force

I've often contemplated over what makes humans act and react the way we do. What are we? Where did we come from? What is the meaning of all this? And I suppose it's these questions that have led me to research all aspects of my life, the mind, spirit, body and soul. (hence the name of this blogspot)

Think about this for just a second. Who approved the first textbook for children to learn from? Who wrote the words? How did they know that these words were the 'whole truth, nothing but truth."

You may be asking, 'why is this important, what am I getting at here?'

We have been programmed, just as our parents were programmed, to process information in the same way. This has been a vicious cycle, promoted by the wealthiest humans (since they were the ones with the funds to promote their books ;~) , and in a sense, I believe they have dumbed down our society. No two brains are alike, so why should we program them all as if they were equals. I believe this is why some people don't get concepts as easily as others, they weren't wired in that fashion. If we found a universal way to learn open ended, we may have more Einsteins and Hawkings.

My second question to think about. Do we see things physically the same? If we point at what we perceive to be red enough - then we learn that color to be red. In reality my red could be your green. However, we will never know because we have all been taught the same.

If this theory is proven to be true, that we all see things uniquely, again a universal open ended mind approach would be beneficial.

I apply this concept to Religion and Secret Societies. There are levels within the Freemasons, and levels within churches. I was recently reading H.P. Jeffers, "Freemasons: A History and Exploration of the World's Oldest Secret Society". I was fascinated as I learned about the levels. As in introductory level, they were told that the Sun was god. However, as they level up they learned that the Sun produced the Energy that was god. And level up again and the Sun is part of the Energy that is god balanced by the heavens. And so on.

Why can't they just tell people how things are? Why start simplistic?

In comparison, my Catholic upbringing taught me about heaven and god. "HE" had a white beard, "HE" was very angry, and also very loving, and also forgiving. (interesting mix) If I didn't go to church I was going to HELL. If I sinned I was going to HELL. If I ate meat on Friday in lent, I was going to HELL. Hell was a place of fire and darkness. The most uncomfortable place ever, and there was a devil that had a pitchfork.

Then I entered college where the propaganda machine really worked in. I was taught about the soul and philosophical thinking. I was told dogs and animals can't have souls because they lack free will, which by the way, was granted by - yup - GOD. It was around here I stepped up and out of the traditions I had been taught. I always had questions, but now I was offended. I loved my dog, I was sure my dog loved me, I was sure my dog had every bit of a 'soul' and spirit as myself.

Then I entered a Master's program at a Catholic University, that dealt with spirituality. I was told God wasn't a white bearded fellow. Hell may not be what we were taught. Heaven probably isn't a place where we go and party with our parents. Etc Etc Etc. The years of thought were destroyed. My brain was opened. I broke out of the years of textbook education and became one of the scariest things a human can become. I became a free thinker.

My views now are critical of government, schools, religion and organizations. I believe that in 1776, the people who overthrew the British control were also free thinkers. I believe in that Constitution that we adopted here in the United States that provided freedom with respect to individuals rights.

Somewhere along the way, the textbook writers, the bankers, the elitist - took control. And we have been spinning away from a freethinking society ever since. Individual rights have diminished - look at the Patriot Act - don't just hear about it - read it! By being a member of myspace or facebook the government has placed people on 'watch lists'. (MSNBC Monday July 16th) We live in fear. We do not have freedom.

Is this why we are here? To serve another's agenda? Or are we here to connect and better ourselves? If you feel like you should better yourself, get involved. Research books, but look and be aware of who did the source research.... Read, and look at who did the writing. Find alternative viewpoints. Listen to outlandish ideas. Think for just a second, maybe were computers. Maybe a planet blew up millions of years ago and we came here. Maybe those with power know more then we do. Maybe we ourselves are aliens that invaded earth. Maybe the earth is a tiny molecule making up a large body, and our movements here on earth are so minuscule they go unnoticed.

Maybe today you'll discover answers. I'll keep writing and trying to learn and acknowledge more.

-Slice and Dice

Ron Paul 2008

The hype, The lies, The denail.
http://digg.com/2008_us_elections/FOX_News_hates_Republican_candidate_Ron_Paul

If you are anything like me, you may have heard of a presidential candidate by the name of Dr. Ron Paul. He is a Congressman from Texas currently serving his 10th term. He is a republican hopeful, but many are ignoring him. Why?

With more money raised then John McCain in the last quarter:
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/politics/4969941.html

More Military Support then any other candidate - either Democrat or Republican:
http://digg.com/politics/Military_Favors_Ron_Paul_Over_McCain

More youtube support then Hillary and Barack combined!:
http://demidog.blogspot.com/2007/07/ron-paul-interest-continues-at.html

He's won the public opinion on ALL the polls following debates:
http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig8/haman1.html

He's a threat to someone, somewhere. Or people are to brainwashed and braindead to think for themselves. I was talking to a friend recently about Dr. Paul. He told me, I would love to vote for him, but I don't want to waste my vote on someone who can't win.

SHOCKED.

We still live in a free democratic society... right? right?!

Last time I checked, ANYONE, that runs, can win. They just need the votes. This moral relativism seems to have affected many in this country. They watch the news on CNN/FOX/MSNBC etc... and then regurgitate the facts back that they were spoonfed.

If this was a wise practice, then CNN would lead you to believe that Ron Paul is the next anti-Christ. Rolling Stone Magazine's Tim Dickinson, has suggested Ron Paul supporters wear tinfoil hats. They trivialize his support any chance they get. They claim his supporters hacked and askewed the poll numbers.

When will it be accepted that JUST MAYBE, Ron Paul has the support of thousand if not a million voters?

They try to discredit him by twisting his words, but I beleive like Ghandi and other truth seekers, in the end - the truth prevails.

Ron Paul is Hope for America.

I hope America takes notice.

This is my first blog ever, but I hope to write more and contribute to the politcal uncovering.